Vol 5 n° 1 - Dementia
Past issues Contributors How to publish Contributions and comments Home
 
rain atherosclerosis” was the term historically used in an attempt to provide a rational explanation for the progressive cognitive decline observed in many—but not all—elderly people. The term was derived from the observation that the vasculature of the brain was dis- rupted in the elderly, like that of the rest of the organs, and  that  many—but  not  all—demented  individuals showed  brain  infarcts  at  postmortem  examination. Despite  the  fact  that Alois Alzheimer  published  his description of a demented individual with no significant underlying vascular pathology 100 years ago, the efforts to distinguish between vascular and nonvascular demen- tia were mostly undertaken in the 1970s.1-3 The impetus to  distinguish  between  the  two  types  of  dementia, Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and the entity initially termed multi-infarct  dementia  (MID)  and  later  on  vascular dementia  (VD),  had  both  scientific  and  pragmatic underpinning (the change from MID to VD was neces- sary, since the term MID did not cover the full range of cerebrovascular pathology). Reasoning for differentiation between AD and VD The scientific reasoning for the distinction between AD and VD was based on evidence collected during the 1970s and 1980s, leading investigators to conclude that a vascular pathology was not the main underlying pathol- ogy   for   most   demented   individuals.   First,   many demented individuals had diffuse amyloid deposits or plaques and neurofibrillary tangles as the predominant postmortem  pathology, with  no  or  minimal  vascular pathology   or   infarcts.1   Second,  in   some   of   these demented individuals with predominantly plaques and tangles, the counts of the cholinergic cells in the nucleus basalis of Meynert were diminished, as was the activity of the neurotransmitter acetylcholine in the cortex.4-8 S t a t e   o f   t h e   a r t 7 Is the distinction between Alzheimer’s disease and vascular dementia possible and relevant? Ramit Ravona-Springer, MD; Michael Davidson, MD; Shlomo Noy, MD, PhD Keywords:  Alzheimer’s  disease;  vascular  dementia;  cardiovascular  risk  factor; cholesterol; apolipoprotein E; diabetes; hyperhomocysteinemia Author affiliations: Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel (Shlomo Noy, Michael Davidson, Ramit Ravona-Springer) Address for correspondence: Michael Davidson, MD, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Beitan 39A, Tel-Hashomer 52621, Israel
(e-mail: davidso@netvision.net.il)
“B Advances in epidemiological, clinical, imaging, and neuro- pathological studies have undermined the clear distinc- tion between vascular and Alzheimer-type dementia, which has characterized the last two decades of research in dementia. A significant degree of overlap between the two entities was demonstrated in terms of clinical expres- sion, risk factors, and postmortem brain autopsy. In this article, we propose mechanisms by which cardiovascular risk factors might affect the manifestation of Alzheimer’s disease, suggest possible explanations for the overlap with vascular dementia, and discuss the implications this might have  on  future  differential  diagnosis  and  treatment strategies. Dialogues Clin Neurosci. 2003;5:7-15.