Vol 5 n° 2 - Psychiatric disorders in somatic medicine
Past issues Contributors How to publish Contributions and comments Home
 
n most health care systems, primary care doc- tors are the cornerstone of recognition, diagnosis, treat- ment, and specialist referral for all types of disorders, whether they are somatic, psychological, or both. The past two decades have witnessed a further emphasis of this role, particularly with regard to the treatment of mental  disorders  in  primary  care.  Several  reasons account for this. First, mental disorders are extremely prevalent in the community, and much more than previ- ously thought. Current epidemiological findings suggest that almost 50% of the population will experience at least one mental disorder in their lifetime, and at least 25% have suffered from a mental disorder during the past 12 months.1-3 Second, international epidemiological evidence suggests that, of all the people with mental dis- order who receive treatment, a large proportion obtain at least minimal intervention through their primary care doctor.4,5 Third, the continuing trend of reducing psychi- atric hospital beds contributes to a larger burden of psy- chiatric patients in outpatient and, particularly, primary care settings. Finally, the rapidly accumulating knowl- edge in clinical neuroscience and clinical psychology has resulted in various new treatment options for a wide range of neuropsychiatric conditions and disorders, and many of these can be applied in primary care. In most systems, the majority of people report at least one primary care visit per year, thereby maintaining a stable and enduring relationship. On this basis, the gen- eral practitioner (GP) may develop a deeper under- standing of individual vulnerability for certain diseases, illness behavior, the waxing and waning of disorders, the development of somatic and mental comorbidities, and the ability to overcome the direct and indirect effects of diseases.  GPs  also  frequently  have  a  more  intimate knowledge of the psychosocial context in which patients’ distress and illnesses occur (ie, interpersonal and family crises,  occupational  and  employment  problems,  and S t a t e   o f   t h e   a r t 1 1 5 Mental disorders in primary care Hans-Ulrich Wittchen, Dipl Psych, PhD; Stephan Mühlig, Dipl Psych, PhD; Katja Beesdo, Dipl Psych Keywords: primary care; mental disorder; recognition; management Author   affiliations:   Institute   for   Clinical   Psychology   and   Psychotherapy, Dresden University of Technology, Dresden, Germany (Hans-Ulrich Wittchen, Stephan  Mühlig,  Katja  Beesdo);  Max  Planck  Institute  of  Psychiatry,  Clinical Psychology and Epidemiology, Munich, Germany (Hans-Ulrich Wittchen) Address  for  correspondence:  Prof  Dr  Hans-Ulrich  Wittchen,  Institute  of Clinical  Psychology  and  Psychotherapy,  Technical  University  of  Dresden, Chemnitzerstrasse 46, D-01187 Dresden, Germany (e-mail: wittchen@mpipsykl.mpg.de) I Current estimates indicate that 50% of the population experience at least one mental disorder in their lifetime and that at least 25% have suffered a mental disorder in the past year. Recognition, diagnosis, treatment, and referral depend overwhelmingly on general practitioners, at least one third of whose consultations have a direct and explicit psychological component. Yet despite this inten- sive  familiarization  with  the  presentation  of  mental pathology, and the appropriateness of the primary care setting to its management, even the most recent surveys indicate that performance is best described by the rule of diminishing halves: only half the patients with a thresh- old disorder are recognized; only half of those recognized are treated; and only half of those treated are effectively treated. There is no single solution to this problem, only multiple solutions, which must be aimed, consistently and simultaneously, at the patient, practitioner, practice, and research levels. Dialogues Clin Neurosci. 2003;5:115-128.