Unipolar major depression is one of the most common mental diseases worldwide., Unfortunately, not all patients respond to the available pharmacological treatment algorithms and refractory depression is not uncommon. Furthermore, the underlying pathophysiological mechanisms of this affective disorder are still under debate. In spite of these neurobiological uncertainties, we are in need of alternative treatment options. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS; a type of TMS that occurs in a rhythmic and repetitive form) has been put forward as a new technique to treat this debilitating illness. Current evidence suggests that rTMS applied to the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) is a promising treatment strategy for depression, but not all patients show a positive outcome. , Current clinical outcome studies report rather modest superiority compared with placebo (sham). - To date, it remains unclear which TMS parameters, such as stimulation duration and intensity, can produce the most benefits. , , , Moreover, there is no consensus of the exact brain localization for individual coil placement. To answer these important questions, it would be important to gain more insight in the underlying neurobiological working mechanisms of rTMS. To date, no clear theoretical framework has yet emerged as to why rTMS treatment could result in a “normalization” of mood in depressed patients. ,
rTMS, the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, and unipolar depression
The majority of rTMS treatment studies target the DLPFC, The (dorsolateral) prefrontal cortex is implicated in regulating affective states, providing cognitive control over stress and emotion responsiveness. A variety of studies has shown that a series of daily sessions of high frequency ( HF)-rTMS delivered to the left DLPFC or low frequency (LF)-rTMS applied to the right DLPFC are effective in reducing symptoms in clinically depressed populations. , , rTMS can either activate or suppress motor, sensory, or cognitive functions, depending on the brain location and parameters of its delivery: LF-rTMS (<1Hz) is considered to “inhibit” cortical regional activity, while HF-rTMS (>1Hz) “activates” cortical areas. , The stimulation effects not only affect neuronal activities in the stimulated regions primarily but also those connected to them secondarily , The vast majority of rTMS studies in major depression target the left DLPFC with HF stimulation.
The rationale to use the DLPFC as the rTMS target area originates from brain imaging research, where patients with unipolar depression show prefrontal abnormalities (predominantly on the left)., Decreased neuronal activities in the (dorsolateral) prefrontal regions, as well as in the rostral anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) areas, closely connected to the DLPFC, are often reported. These frontal hypoactivities result in apathy, psychomotor slowness, and impaired executive functioning. Besides dysfunctional “frontocingulate networks,” other neuronal pathways between the orbital and medial prefrontal cortex, the amygdala, and hippocampus are implicated in the pathophysiology of mood disorders. ,
Endocrinological disturbances and hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal ( HPA) system deregulations are commonly found., The most consistently described biological abnormality in chronic major depression is a failing negative feedback system resulting in hypercortisolism ( ).
Brain imaging studies and rTMS
Brain imaging results suggest that antidepressant response to rTMS might vary as a function of stimulation frequency, and may depend on pretreatment prefrontal brain metabolism. , For instance, the stimulation of prefrontal regions with lower metabolic activity with HF-rTMS may significantly improve clinical outcome. However, opposite results, where higher baseline metabolic activities in the DLPFC bilaterally were associated with better clinical outcome, have been reported as well. - Additionally, higher baseline activities in the ACC are not only predictive for treatment outcome in pharmacological antidepressant trials, electrophysiological imaging studies, and sleep deprivation studies, , , but high pretreatment ACC activities were also a positive clinical predictor in HF-rTMS treatment protocols. ,
Concerning the neurobiological effects, rTMS seems to influence metabolic activity of the ACC.Whereas right-sided LF-rTMS showed metabolic ACC decreases, left-sided HF-rTMS treatment resulted in higher ACC metabolic activity, , especially in those subdivisions of the ACC which are strongly interconnected with DLPFC areas. , However, in some reports successful HF-rTMS treatment did not result in significant ACC metabolic increases. Furthermore, Luborzewski et al failed to demonstrate neurochemical ACC alterations post HF-rTMS, and Loo et al demonstrated that one session of LF-rTMS seemed rather to deactivate the ACC than to activate it. Altogether, the majority of successful rTMS treatment studies correspond with pathophysiological models of major depression that are based on dysfunctions within fronto-cingulate networks, - although the direction of the changes is not consistent over studies.
Neuroendocrinology and rTMS
An important aspect of the physiology of rTMS could be related to the endocrinological response of the HPA axis.
In addition, in a sham-controlled left prefrontal HFrTMS trial, Szuba et alfound acute mood and serum thyroid-stimulating hormone elevations in drug-free depressed patients after each active stimulation session. Mood improvement was only observed after active HFrTMS. These observations could imply that the clinical effects of rTMS act in a similar way to pharmacological interventions: clinical improvement after antidepressant treatment has been associated with a normalization of HPA system function and different antidepressants may act in the same way in attenuating the HPA axis. , However, it has to be noted that in depressed patients HPA system abnormalities are not consistently observed.
Neurotransmitter systems and rTMS
Only a few studies have examined the rTMS effects on neurotransmitter systems in major depression. Because rTMS treatment resulted in psychomotor symptom improvement, such as a reduction in motor slowness in bodily movement and speech, increased voice volume, and facial inexpressivity, some authors suggested that a possible working mechanism of action could be by activating the dopaminergic system., Indeed, several brain imaging studies using dopaminergic ligands point to an rTMS-related release in endogenous dopamine when stimulating prefrontal cortical areas, , although others found no impact on the dopaminergic system at all. , In major depression, the serotonergic system has been extensively investigated, and serotonin (5-HT) is an important excitatory transmitter involved in HPAsystem regulation. In a severely depressed medication-resistant sample, successful clinical outcome after HF-rTMS treatment was associated with DLPFC 5HT2A receptor upregulation and hippocampal 5-HT2A receptor downregulation, measured with 123I-5-IR91150 SPECT Interestingly, this prefrontal increase of this type of postsynaptic receptor agrees with treatment response findings after treatment with selective serotonin uptake inhibitors (SSRIs) and electroconvulsive therapy (ECT). , As clinical recovery is reported to be associated with increased brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) expression in the hippocampus, it was suggested that the observed 5-HT2A receptor downregulation in the hippocampus would be associated with BDNF increases in this area comparable to the effects of most pharmacological antidepressant agents. However, as rTMS responders seem to be resistant to acute mood changes after trypthophan depletion, it may be possible that the neurobiological influence of rTMS does not only depend on the central availability of serotonin to exert antidepressant effects. In short, whether the rTMS effects are attributed to the modulation of only the serotonergic system remains unclear. A beneficial treatment outcome has been related to glutaminergic increases under the stimulated area (left DLPFC) in depressed patients. From an electrophysiological point of view, stimulation of the DLPFC might influence 5-HT2A receptors in the hippocampus via (glutaminergic) pyramidal neurons. Furthermore, research on the chronic effects of TMS on hippocampal evoked potentials demonstrates that TMS is accompanied by changes in the local hippocampal inhibitory circuits (g-aminobutyric acid, GABA). The implication of glutaminergic/GABAergic deficits in major depression has been proposed, but to date the influence of rTMS on the glutaminergic/ GABA system has only been demonstrated in healthy individuals. , A single active HF-rTMS session increased glutamate/glutamine levels in the prefrontal cortices, suggesting that this application may act via the stimulation of the glutaminergic prefrontal neurons. Concerning the inhibitory effects, active rTMS resulted in increases in cortical inhibition; however, in this study only the left motor cortex was stimulated.
Neurotrophic factors and rTMS
Brain and endocrinological data indirectly suggest that a clinical beneficial rTMS outcome affects neurotrophic factors in the brain.Animal studies already demonstrated increases in the expression of BDNF in the rat hippocampus after the application of long-term HFrTMS similar to antidepressant drug treatment and ECT In a sample of drug-resistant depressed patients, Zanardini et al reported on a normalizing rTMS effect of initially decreased serum BDNF. Yukimisa et al demonstrated that changes in serum BDNF correlated positively (rs=0.34) with changes on the 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale in all depressed patients treated with HF-rTMS. These trend-like correlations were found to be significant when comparing responders with nonresponders; an increase of BDNF levels was only observed in those patients who clinically responded to the HF-rTMS treatment.
In unipolar depressed patients, beneficial rTMS treatment has immediate and prolonged neurobiological effects. Neurobiological data support the choice of the left DLPFC as a valid rTMS target site to intervene with the neuronal pathways deregulated in major depression. The observed changes in a depressionrelated neurocircuitry seem to agree with other successful treatment modalities, such as pharmacological antidepressant treatment and ECT. Although further research is required, biological data indicate that depressed patients with some kind of “preserved” cortico- subcortical neurocircuitries could be susceptible to rTMS treatment. Displaying a metabolically more active fronto-cingulate network at baseline indicates a possible better clinical outcome. This observation is consistent with the hypothesis that the synchronized modulation of “dysfunctional fronto-cingulate pathways” is critical for illness remission.In short, successful rTMS treatment seems to result in a cascade of neurobiological changes in brain areas linked with the stimulated area, supporting the integrative model of action depicted in Figures 1 and 2. Whether the rTMS effects are modulated by NT systems or neurotrophic factors remains to be clarified.