Early life stress and social adversity have been associated with behavioral disorders later in life.What are the mechanisms that mediate between experiences early in life and changes in stable phenotype later in life? Since these phenotypes are apparent a long time after the early experience, the changes in gene expression programming must be stable. It is postulated here that epigenetic mechanisms which evolved to confer cell-type-specific gene expression during embryonal and postnatal development are also involved in conferring experiential-specific gene expression profiles, mediating the phenotypic consequences of early life stress.
Epigenetic mechanisms explain how identical genes are differentially expressed in space and time in different cell types in the same individual. Epigenetic mechanisms establish cell-type-specific long-term states of gene expression during embryonal and postnatal development.The focus in this review is on DNA methylation, which is a chemical covalent modification of the genetic “hardware” itself and has been the most studied epigenetic mechanism in relation to early-life stress.
DNA methylation and hydroxymethylation
Both adenine and cytosine bases in DNA could be enzymatically modified by DNA methylation. The methyl donor for the reaction is S-adenosyl methionine (SAMe).The role of cytosine methylation in gene regulation has been extensively studied in mammalian DNA while the presence of N(6)-methyladenine in vertebrates and human DNA was discovered recently and its role in gene regulation and cellular differentiation is yet unclear. In vertebrates, DNA methylation is prevalent in the dinucleotide CG, which is a palindromic sequence (5’CG3’/5’GC3’). This enables semiconservative replication of DNA methylation from the template DNA (5’CG3’) to the nascent DNA (5’GC3’) by the DNA methyltransferase 1 (DNMT1) enzyme, a maintenance DNMT1. The maintenance of DNA methylation in dividing cells implies that a new methylation introduced into a CG sequence in DNA will be inherited through many cell divisions. A different set of enzymes, de novo methyltransferases DNMT3a and DNMT3b, introduce methyl groups to DNA irrespective of the DNA methylation state of the template, , which will be maintained in following cell divisions by the maintenance DNMT1. Thus, a change in DNA methylation in response to a transient signal introduced by early life stress can be “memorized” in the genome and serve as a genomic memory of the functional state of the gene. Cell-specific DNA methylation patterns are formed during development, are involved in programming cell-type-specific gene expression profiles, and are essential for vertebrate development. , Examination of methylation patterns of genes in different tissues revealed an inverse correlation between DNA methylation of promoter regions and gene activity. , A recent survey of the state of methylation of all promoters in the brain that were physically engaged in active transcription revealed that all active promoters are unmethylated without exception. In contrast, methylation in gene bodies containing the coding regions of the gene, the exons, and the introns seems to positively correlate with gene expression. Interestingly, recently discovered N(6)-Methyladenine is poised at exons of transcribed genes and positively correlates with gene expression.
The methyl moiety on cytosine is further modified by oxidation to 5 hydroxymethyl-cytosine, 5-formylcytosine and 5-carboxylcytosine by ten-eleven translocation (TET 1-3) monooxygenases.The role that these modifications play in controlling gene expression is unclear; however, it is plausible that these oxidized modifications of the methyl moiety provide further fine tuning of epigenetic regulation of genes and are implicated in gene activation during development.
DNA methylation plays a causal role in regulation of gene expression
The inverse correlation between DNA methylation of promoters and transcription suggested that DNA methylation in promoters silences gene expression.The main evolutionary lesson derived from studying bacterial restriction-modification systems was that DNA methylation interfered with the interaction of proteins and their recognition elements in DNA; bacterial restriction enzymes did not cleave their recognition sequence when it was methylated. Similarly, it was shown that DNA methylation interferes with binding of transcription factors to their methylated recognition sequence, resulting in inhibition of transcription initiation. DNA methylation also attracts a specific class of proteins to methylated DNA; methylated DNA binding proteins. These proteins such as MeCP2 recruit chromatin inactivation complexes to promoter resulting in a silencing chromatin configuration. Three lines of evidence support a causal role for DNA methylation in gene expression. First, in vitro methylation of promoters silences reporter gene expression when transfected into cells. Second, treating cells with DNA methylation inhibitor 5-azacytidine activates gene expression. Third, knockdown of DNMT1 in cells or genetic knockout in mice results in changes in gene expression. There is still no evidence that demethylation of a specific set of sites can induce gene expression.
However, recent genome-wide correlations between promoter methylation and gene expression reveal a modest inverse correlation between gene expression and DNA methylation of promoters.It should be noted that the simplistic idea that DNA methylation in promoters is just a mere inverse image of steady-state mRNA levels that dominates the literature is inconsistent with the data and the complexity of epigenetic regulation. First, DNA methylation controls transcription turn-on while most gene expression studies measure steady-state mRNA. Second, expression and DNA methylation are heterogeneous in almost any population of cells. High expression might be occurring in a small fraction of cells that are hypomethylated, while the majority of cells are methylated and silenced. In such a case overlaying methylation and expression, as is commonly done, provides a misleading picture of a highly methylated gene that is highly expressed. RNApolII that is phosphorylated at serine 5 (PS5) is the form of RNApolII present on promoters that is turning on transcription. Bisulfite mapping of PS5 bound DNA and input DNA revealed that promoters engaged in transcription were invariably unmethylated. Even when the overall methylation of a promoter at a brain sample was high, PS5 bound DNA was invariably unmethylated ( Figure 1 ). Thus, the methylation level of a promoter provides a digital count of the fraction of cells in a population where this promoter is silenced. Third, although loss of methylation in a promoter is necessary for expression, it is not sufficient. Demethylation removes a barrier for expression, but expression might be realized at the right time or context when the needed factors or signals are present. For example, prenatal demethylation of an enhancer of the tyrosine aminotransferase gene in the liver programs the gene to respond to glucocorticoids stimulus postnatally. This is important for our discussion of how early life stress triggers phenotypes in adulthood. Gene expression is responsive to time- and context-dependent signals such as neurotransmitters or hormones. DNA methylation anticipates future transcriptional response to triggers; comparing steady-state expression with DNA methylation does not capture the full meaning and scope of the regulatory roles of differential methylation ( Figure 2 ).
Although this review focuses on DNA methylation and no other epigenetic modifications, it should be noted that DNA methylation and chromatin modifications are interrelated. For example, histone acetylation at H3K9 is often correlated with regions of DNA hypomethylation and both are associated with gene expression (for a review see ref 26). Histone methylation at H3K4, which is a marker of active promoters, inhibits binding of DNA methylating enzymes DNMT3A and DNMT3B, thus keeping these active regions hypomethylated. On the other hand, histone methylation at H3K36 which occurs at actively transcribed gene bodies serves to recruit DNA methylating enzymes DNMT3A and 3B to methylated gene bodies of actively transcribed genes (for a review see ref 27).
Evidence for epigenetic programming by early life social environment; the role of the mother
The first evidence that DNA methylation might be mediating long-term programming of DNA function in response to time-limited social exposure came from studies of the effects of differences in maternal care on life-long stress responsivity in rats. Animals that were reared by a high licking and grooming mother exhibited a more measured stress responsiveness than animals reared by a low licking and grooming mother.The differences in stress behavior between offspring of high and low maternal care were not genetically determined, since this phenotype was transferred by a foster mother as well as the biological (genetic) mother. Differences in maternal care are associated with differences in DNA methylation, histone acetylation, transcription factor binding at the glucocorticoid hormone receptor ( NR3C1 ) gene promoter, and expression in the hippocampus of the adult offspring. Animals that received high maternal care exhibited increased H3K9 acetylation, reduced DNA methylation, and increased expression of the glucocorticoid receptor gene in the hippocampus in comparison with the low-care animals. H3K9 acetylation is a hallmark of active genes and there is a close bilateral relation between increased histone acetylation and reduced DNA methylation.
Epigenetic marks are laid down and maintained by enzymes that either add or remove epigenetic modifications and are therefore potentially reversible in contrast to genetic changes. There is therefore a potential therapeutic angle to the discovery of a causal epigenetic driver of behavioral phenotypes.Indeed, treatment of adult rats with methionine, an upstream source of methyl moieties for methylation reactions including DNA methylation, reversed the behavior of high maternal care offspring to a behavior characteristic of low maternal care offspring, while trichostatin A (TSA), a histone deacetylase inhibitor (HDACi), which elevated histone acetylation, triggered loss of DNA demethylation and activation of the glucocorticoid receptor reversed the behavior of offspring of low maternal care, which became similar to offspring of high maternal care mothers. , These studies support a causal role for epigenetic programming by maternal behavior and point to potential epigenetic therapeutics for behavioral/psychiatry disorders.
These early studies also provided a plausible mechanism and a working paradigm for further exploration of the molecular links between experience and epigenetic reprogramming. Stimulation of a serotoninergic cAMP-dependent signaling pathway in the hippocampus of offspring by maternal care leads to activation of the transcription factor nerve growth induced factor A (NGFIA),which in turn recruits epigenetic factors such as the histone acetyl transferase (CREB binding protein) CBP and the methylated DNA binding domain protein MBD2 to the Nr3c1 gene resulting in epigenetic programming of the gene.
Early life adversity and DNA methylation in animal models
Animal studies confirmed DNA methylation programming by early life experience. For example, methylation of brain-derived nerve growth factor (BDNF) is altered in response to an abusive caretaker in the prefrontal cortex,and arginine vasopressin ( Avp ) is demethylated in the paraventricular nucleus in response to early life stress. Maternal separation in two strains of mice triggered sex and strain specific anxiety and heightened stress responsivity later in life and DNA methylation differences in Nr3C1 , Avp , and Nrda4 promoter regions. Avp, Nr3c1, and Nr4a1 are involved in regulation of the HPA axis: the observed changes in methylation potentially affect regulation of expression of these genes and as a consequence the HPA axis. Prenatal stress in rats was shown to affect DNA methylation and expression in the hippocampus and prefrontal cortex of the Glycoprotein M6A ( Gpm6a ) gene, which is involved in filopodium motility and possibly synaptic extension. Animal models were also used to link prenatal stress and schizophrenia-like phenotypes later in life in mice such as deficits in social interaction, prepulse inhibition, and fear conditioning. In these animals DNMT1 and 3a and hydroxy-methylation and methylation in the reelin and Gad67 promoters are elevated in GABAergic neurons in the frontal cortex. The effects of reelin and GAD 67 would be consistent with impaired GABA-ergic inhibition, which is seen in models of schizophrenia.
Early life stress impacts a broad transcriptome and DNA methylation landscape in brain and other tissues; alterations in DNA methylation follow a developmental trajectory and are sex-specific
Maternal care affects a wide transcriptomic landscape in the hippocampusand broad genomic regions including the entire protocadherin α, β, and γ gene families. Several of the protocadherin genes are associated with neurodevelopment and neuropsychiatric disorders consistent with functional implications for these epigenetic alterations. The response to early life stress and maternal behavior is also not limited to the brain and involves at least the immune system as well. Studies of rhesus macaques revealed differentially methylated regions in both T cells and prefrontal cortex in monkeys who were separated from their mothers after birth. There was a small overlap between differentially methylated regions in brain and immune cells; however, there were notably many tissue specific differentially methylated sites. The immune system has been long known to be impacted by early life stress in both animal models and in humans. , The response to behavioral experiences, stress, and adversity early in life is system-wide and is not limited to the brain, while most probably driven by sensing mechanisms in the brain. Several lines of study suggest a bilateral dialogue between immune and neuroendocrine functions in humans and animals and a crosstalk which affects behavior immunity and inflammation.
The placenta is also impacted by maternal social experience and early life stress. Maternal social rank differences in nonhuman primates were associated with broad changes in DNA methylation in placentae.The changes in DNA methylation that were associated with maternal rank found in placentae overlapped with gene expression alterations associated with social rank in adult rhesus monkeys discovered in a different, independent study. These cross-sectional analyses are consistent with the hypothesis that epigenetic markers of early social experience in placentae are predictive of changes in expression later in life. The placenta is potentially a unique resource for early life biomarkers of psychiatric and immunological risks. This hypothesis was recently tested in a genetic model of glucocorticoid depletion in mice. Nr3c1-/+ mice exhibit sex-specific differences in DNA methylation in the placentae, which predicted anxiety behavior in adulthood.
In rhesus macaques, DNA methylation profiles dynamically evolve from birth to adolescence and are sex-dependent.Maternal deprivation alters the normal evolution of DNA methylation profiles. Early DNA methylation differences in maternally deprived macaques anticipate later changes in methylation. This might explain how early life experiences impact phenotypes at a later time point in life.
Evidence for epigenetic programming by early life stress in humans
In comparison with animal studies, it is more difficult to obtain evidence in humans for associations of DNA methylation with early life stress. Heterogeneity of human populations results in confounding genetic and environmental factors. Moreover, since the brain is inaccessible for DNA methylation analysis in living humans, most studies are limited to peripheral tissues such as saliva and white blood cells, and the relevance to brain physiology and pathology is uncertain. Obtaining any causal evidence or mechanistic insights linking DNA methylation alterations with physiological function is difficult in human studies, and even temporal relationships between exposure, DNA methylation, and phenotypic outcome mostly rely on cross-sectional design. The low absolute differences in methylation seen in most human behavioral EWAS raise questions about their biological significance.
Several approaches were used to overcome some but not all these inherent difficulties. First, studies used an evolutionary approach and examined whether epigenetic alterations in human post-mortem brain samples replicated observations in rodents and nonhuman primate experiments. For example, the region of the Nr3c1 gene that was differentially methylated by maternal care in rat hippocampus was also differentially methylated by child abuse in post-mortem hippocampi of humans.This overlap extended well beyond the Nr3c1 gene, and a broad evolutionary conserved response was observed across a syntenic locus that covers the Nr3c1 gene and the protocadherin alpha, beta, and gamma gene families.
Although post-mortem studies examine epigenetic programming in physiologically relevant tissues, they represent only a final and single stage that does not capture the dynamic evolution of environments and epigenetic programming in living humans. This is possible only in peripheral tissues such as blood and saliva. Studies have examined in the last decade alterations in DNA methylation in candidate genes in response to maternal stress, early life stress, and early life trauma including the NR3C1, exon 1f region, which corresponds to the region that is altered in hippocampi of rats, the proximal regulator of glucocorticoid receptor FKBP5 , BDNF , OXTR , and the serotonin transporter SLC6A4 . Low socioeconomic status in childhood was associated with increased methylation in AVP , FKBP5 , and OXTR , and two inflammation-related genes CCL1 and CD1D . DNA methylation differences in CD1D and FKBP5 were associated with expression differences and these changes in expression were negatively correlated with changes in DNA methylation.
A third approach was to combine a human blood study with cross-species and cross-tissue (brain/blood) comparisons at multiple time points. Using this approach, the Morc1 gene was found to be differentially methylated in CD34+ cells from cord bloods from children who were exposed to prenatal stress compared with controls, in CD3+ T cells from newborn and adolescent monkeys and in the prefrontal cortex of adult rats.Morc1 was also associated with major depressive disorder (MDD) in a gene-set-based analysis of data from a genome-wide association study, possibly pointing to a link between epigenetic programming by early life stress and psychiatric disorders later in life.
A fourth approach was to combine blood/saliva DNA methylation with brain imaging. Methylation of the serotonin transporter gene Slc6a4 correlated with serotonin synthesis in the orbitofrontal cortex measured with positron emission tomography (PET) and childhood physical aggression.
Broad signature of early life experience in DNA methylation
The epigenetic response associated with early life stress has a broad footprint in DNA methylation in blood, and brain. DNA methylation measured in 40 adults enrolled in the 1958 British Birth Cohort showed association with early life socioeconomic status in multiple loci in blood. Socioeconomic status differences were associated with DNA methylation differences in nonhuman primates and humans in placentae at birth. Childhood abuse was associated with methylation in multiple loci in DNA and multiple changes in DNA methylation were observed in a study that compared people who suffered from post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) who were also exposed to childhood adversity with those exposed only to adult trauma. Prenatal maternal stress was associated with differential methylation in multiple loci in CD34+ cells from cord blood. However, the functional meaning of small epigenetic changes in methylation in blood in multiple loci is yet unclear.
In contrast to this line of studies that showed consistent but nevertheless small differences in DNA methylation in candidate genes and genome wide analyses, a recent study shed doubt on the association between childhood trauma and DNA methylation changes in blood.The study analyzed the largest number of samples to date and found no evidence for association of DNA methylation in blood with childhood trauma, even in candidate genes that were shown in multiple studies to associate with early life adversity, after correction for confounding factors such as cigarette smoking. The study compels us to replicate and revisit this question.
Natural disasters, a quasi-experimental design for examining causal relations between stress and epigenetic programming
The Quebec 1988 ice storm provided an opportunity to examine the impact of randomized objective stress of mothers on children who were born around the time of the storm. An epigenome-wide association study of T cells obtained from these children 13 years later revealed many changes in DNA methylation that correlated with maternal objective stress,while mothers’ cognitive appraisal of the stress associated with a different set of DNA methylation alterations. Analysis of the functional gene networks that were altered with perinatal maternal stress showed predominantly genes involved in immunity and inflammation, as well as the insulin pathway.
Consistent with the functional network analysis, DNA methylation was found to mediate the effects of prenatal maternal objective stressand mother’s cognitive appraisal on BMI and obesity in the children, the effect of cognitive appraisal on child’s C-peptide in adolescence (a measure of endogenous insulin secretion), as well as the effect of objective prenatal stress on cytokine production in the children. These data are consistent with a causal link between prenatal stress, DNA methylation in immune cells, and metabolic and immune system phenotypes.
What are the mechanisms that translate prenatal stress into DNA methylation alterations in multiple tissues?
A likely suspect to mediate a system-wide epigenetic response to stress is the glucocorticoid stress hormone. Glucocorticoids are released in response to social stress, are distributed systemically, have nuclear receptors that are distributed across the body, and are epigenetic modulators. Other endocrine molecules are also candidates.
In support of this hypothesis, prenatal synthetic glucocorticoid exposure in the guinea pig triggered broad alterations in DNA methylation, histone acetylation, and gene expression in the fetal hippocampus., Further evidence for the involvement of glucocorticoid pathway came from examining the impact of fetal hemizygous depletion of Nr3c1 on DNA methylation in placenta at birth in mice. Nr3c1 heterozygosity leads to altered DNA methylation in a sex-specific manner across multiple sites in the placenta ; DNA methylation of several genes in the placenta correlated with anxiety-like behavior in adults, suggesting a temporal relationship between DNA methylation alterations and development of behavioral phenotypes.
A recent study provided evidence for this mechanism in human cells. Exposure of human hippocampal neuron progenitors to glucocorticoids resulted in long-lasting broad changes in DNA methylation, which were not associated with steady-state gene expression. However, re-exposure of the neurons to glucocorticoids resulted in an enhanced response.This is consistent with the idea that methylation defines the potential responsivity of the gene to future triggers. Differential methylation in glucocorticoid-treated hippocampal neurons overlapped with transcriptional response to glucocorticoids in peripheral blood and a polyepigenetic score computed from differentially methylated sites in neurons predicted exposure to prenatal glucocorticoids in newborn cord blood. These data further confirm correspondence of brain blood DNA methylation responses to glucocorticoids.
Summary and perspectives
Animal studies have established plausible molecular pathways between perinatal social exposures, DNA methylation changes, and phenotype. Human studies have been criticized, however, for the small differences in DNA methylation, the small sample sizes, and confounding genetic heterogeneity and other common environmental exposures such as age, smoking, and alcohol. Indeed, a recent large epigenome-wide methylation study failed to confirm previously documented associations with early life trauma, casting doubt on previously described associations in peripheral tissues.
One of the most criticized facets of studies of human early adversity epigenetics is the use of blood or white blood cells for studying behavior, a brain function. Inaccessibility of the brain in living humans precludes, except for post-mortem studies, examination of “functionally relevant” epigenetic profiles. Studies therefore examined blood or saliva DNA as a surrogate tissue. The assumption is that certain DNA methylation profiles show the same interindividual differences in blood and brain or saliva and brain. Several studies have delineated such sites,, and some studies use these comparisons as a guide. Methylation differences in “brain-specific genes” were reported in blood in several human studies. However, it is unclear whether corresponding changes exist in the brain.
Animal studies and experiments in human hippocampal neurons provide a plausible mechanism linking perinatal stress and changes in DNA methylation across several tissues. Involvement of the stress hormone in triggering these changes could explain how a stress sensed by the brain can have a systemic effect across several tissues and target overlapping sites in different tissues, since glucocorticoids have nuclear receptors in many tissues and overlapping glucocorticoid recognition elements in different tissues. It is possible then that DNA methylation changes only poise genes for expression,while the presence of a brain-specific transcription factor activates the gene in the brain. Therefore, although changes in methylation in brain specific genes in response to early life stress happen in several tissues, they will be functionally relevant only in the brain. Thus, absence of correlation between DNA methylation alterations and steady-state expression in peripheral tissues does not necessarily imply that the changes in DNA methylation are functionally irrelevant. In addition, even in the brain, DNA methylation alterations might be programming genes for response to future triggers such as glucocorticoids or neuronal activation, and this might not be reflected in steady-state transcription ( Figure 2 ).
Questions remain on the functional meaning of the changes in DNA methylation for either brain function or peripheral physiological functions. These could be addressed by linking the genes affected to central phenotypes using imaging and mediation analyses in humans, as was described above, as well as pharmacology, targeted gene depletion, or epigenetic editing in animals or primary human hippocampal cultures. Studies of natural disasters provide quasi-experimental designs to draw a causal link between stress and changes in epigenetic states and mediation analyses define a causal link between early life stress, DNA methylation changes, and the phenotype. Although the Quebec ice storm study provides preliminary support for a causal link between perinatal stress, DNA methylation, and phenotypic changes in adults, further similar studies are needed. One of the main difficulties in relating DNA methylation alterations to phenotype is how to link DNA methylation changes in multiple genes with a specific phenotype, since current methods in genetics and pharmacology focus on specific targets.
Although the focus in the field is mainly on examining “brain relevant” DNA methylation marks in peripheral tissue, it is suggested here that the response to stress is systemic and that the immune system and brain are interactive partners in a coordinated developmental and physiological response. Moreover, early life stress is known to impact immune,cardiovascular, and metabolic disorders. DNA methylation alterations in the immune system are therefore an important component of the system-wide response to perinatal stress. Examining how peripheral changes in DNA methylation mediate changes in immunity and inflammatory systems and how they interact with the brain are critical for a comprehensive understanding of epigenetic programming by early life stress and its functional consequences.