An immune-based therapeutic approach in psychiatry is not a particularly new idea; it was actually introduced in the early 1900s when the Austrian physician Julius Ritter Wagner von Jauregg created a “vaccination therapy” for psychiatric patients. Although promising—he treated patients successfully with attenuated pathogens that stimulated the type 1 immune response—such an approach would not be pursued outside German-speaking countries, taking a back seat to the newly introduced electroconvulsive therapy and, later, antidepressant and antipsychotic drug therapies.
The basis for this therapeutic approach was built on the observations of several researchers from Austria, Switzerland, Germany, and other countries, which were summarized by Wagner von Jauregg, as a kind of meta-analysis of evidence from the 19th century. It was noted that during and after typhus epidemics, patients were more seldom affected by infections than the staff of the asylum; the infection rate was roughly half that of the staff.However, in the event that patients were infected, this had an impact on the course of their psychiatric symptoms: about one-third (32%) of the patients showed improvement in the mental disorder and 20% became healthy. Based on these observations, Wagner von Jauregg worked on a method to induce artificial fever in the patients using attenuated strains of Salmonella typhii. Malaria tertiana, and the tuberculin protein. He observed the best effects in syphilis (and would win the Nobel Prize for his discovery), but also described therapeutic success in other psychiatric disorders.
After nearly 60 years of psychopharmacotherapy, the limitations are evident: Whereas first - and secondgeneration antipsychotics show satisfying effects on schizophrenia's positive symptoms (eg, hallucinations and delusions), the effects on negative symptoms and cognitive deficits—syndromes determining the longterm outcome in schizophrenia—are unsatisfying. The fact that the discontinuation of antipsychotics is associated with a relapse rate of 80% in the first 2 yearsunderscores that the treatment of antipsychotic drugs has nearly no therapeutic influence on the (to date still unknown) pathogenesis of the disorder. Although dopaminergic neurotransmission is very important in schizophrenia, and serotonergic/noradrenergic neurotransmission, in major depression (MD), the neurotransmitter disturbances alone cannot explain the pathological process in psychiatric disorders, and modulation of the dopaminergic and the serotonergic/noradrenergic systems often does not achieve the therapeutic goals.
Despite the dominance of neurotransmitter research in biological psychiatry, psychoneuroimmunology has developed over recent decades, investigating the role of immune dysfunction and inflammation in major psychiatric disorders. Although the overall picture is far from clear, it is now widely accepted that a disturbance in the immune system does play a role in at least some subgroups of patients suffering from schizophrenia or MD. However, few immunomodulatory therapeutic interventions are reported in the literature, and even the therapeutic principles—anti-inflammation versus immune activation—are under discussion.
Inflammation and major depression
It is known that in MD, the inflammatory response system is activated.- Although the levels of some markers of inflammation, such as C-reactive protein, tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α, interleukin (IL)-1, and IL-1 receptor antagonist differ between studies, it is clear that IL-6 levels are elevated in MD patients, as evidenced by two meta-analyses. , Moreover, MD is often triggered by stress, and stress activates the immune system; in particular, early-life stress and separation stress, their effects influenced by genetic disposition, are associated with elevated levels of proinflammatory cytokines. These cytokines activate the immune system and proinflammatory prostaglandins, such as prostaglandin E, (PGE2), which has an important role in mediating inflammation. Indeed, PGE2 levels are high in the saliva, serum, and cerebrospinal fluid of depressed patients. - Proinflammatory molecules are also produced and released in the brain, where activation of microglia cells and astrocytes plays a key role. Here, interactions in play between the immune system and neurotransmitters, the tryptophan/kynurenine system, and neurotransmission via the glutametergic system provide links between the immune system, stress, and depression. Accordingly, anti-inflammatory therapy, eg, with the cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) inhibitor celecoxib—COX-2 being involved in PGE2 mediation of inflammation—is effective in depression.
Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug therapy (in particular, COX-2 inhibitors) in major depression
COX-2 inhibitors (a type of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs [NSAID]) influence the serotonergic system in the central nervous system (CNS), both directly and through immune mechanisms in the CNS. In a rat model, rofecoxib increases serotonin levels in the frontal and the temporoparietal cortex.Therefore, one would expect treatment with COX-2 inhibitors to have a clinical antidepressant effect. In one animal model of depression—the bulbectomized rat—longterm treatment with celecoxib was associated with decreased cytokine levels in the hypothalamus and behavioral changes. In another animal model of depression, add-on treatment with acetylsalicylic acid, a mixed COX-1/COX-2 inhibitor, sped up fluoxetine's antidepressant effect and resulted in an additional antidepressant effect. In a randomized, double-blind add-on study comparing treatment with reboxetine plus COX-2 inhibitor celecoxib and reboxetine plus placebo in humans, celecoxib had a significant therapeutic effect for MD. Interestingly, the kynurenine to tryptophan ratio, representing the activity of the proinflammatory cytokine-driven enzyme indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase (IDO), was predictive of the antidepressant response to celecoxib therapy: those with a high kynurenine-to-tryptophan ratio and thus high IDO enzymatic activity—representing an elevated level of proinflammatory activity—responded better to celecoxib. In another randomized, double-blind study that included 50 MD patients, outcomes were significantly better in patients treated with celecoxib plus fluoxetine than with fluoxetine plus placebo. , A similar finding was recently reported in a study including 40 depressed patients randomized to treatment with a combination of sertraline and celecoxib or sertraline and placebo. Of note, the level of IL-6 in the blood was predictive of the antidepressant response in both groups.
A meta-analysis including 150 MD patients investigated the efficacy of add-on treatment with the NSAID celecoxib. The study concluded that add-on treatment with celecoxib could be promising in such patients. However, the efficacy and tolerability of NSAIDs in depression treatment needs to be confirmed in studies of longer duration and that have a larger sample size.
Statins as an anti-inflammatory therapeutic approach in major depression
Although used primarily for their lipid-lowering properties, statins also have direct anti-inflammatory effects not mediated by that activity., Therefore, in line with the inflammatory hypothesis of depression, a large population-based study including nearly 900 000 selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) users, of whom more than 110 000 used a statin concomitantly, investigated the possible antidepressant effect of statins. The concomitant treatment of SSRI and statins resulted in a robust advantage regarding the risk for (a relapse to) depression compared with an SSRI alone.
Other anti-inflammatory therapeutic approaches in depression
Another anti-inflammatory approach is the use of monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) as cytokine blockers. For example, infliximab is a chimeric monoclonal antibody against TNF-a; it prevents TNF- binding to its cell-surface receptors. Initially developed as a treatment for inflammatory joint disorders and psoriasis, it was found to have a significant effect against symptoms of depression in psoriasis patients.However, a placebo-controlled add-on study using infliximab therapy in depressed patients who were resistant to treatment failed to show an overall antidepressant effect. In that study, 60 patients considered nonresponders to antidepressant therapy—of which 23 were partly medicationfree—received three doses of either infliximab or placebo over a 12-week trial period. Although the infliximab-treated group did not demonstrate an overall better outcome than that of the placebo group, a significant interaction was noted between treatment response and baseline C-reactive protein levels (≤5 mg/L): a higher response rate to infliximab (62%) vs placebo (33%) was found in those with higher baseline levels of C-reactive protein. Furthermore, infliximab responders had significantly higher baseline levels of TNF-α and soluble TNF receptors 1 and 2 (P≤0.01) than nonresponders, and significantly higher decreases in C-reactive protein levels (P≤0.01). This finding is especially remarkable, as the study only included treatment-resistant patients.
Interestingly, there are also preliminary findings of anti-inflammatory effects in the CNS, along with improvement in stress and anxiety, associated with blockade of angiotensin II type 1 (AT11) receptors., Moreover, it is probable that treatment resistance to antidepressants such as SSRIs is related to inflammation.
Meta-analysis of anti-inflammatory therapies (NSAIDs and cytokine inhibitors) in major depression
A recently published meta-analysis including 14 trials (reported in ten publications) on anti-inflammatory treatment in MD (n=6262) showed very interesting results: included were 10 trials investigating NSAIDs (n=4258) and four investigating cytokine inhibitors (n=2004).The pooled effect estimate showed that treatment reduced depressive symptoms compared with placebo (standardized mean difference [SMD], -0.34; 95% confidence interval [CI], -0.57 to -0.11; heterogeneity statistic [I2]=90%). The superiority of treatment over placebo was noted in studies including patients with clinical depression (SMD, -0.54; 95% CI, -1.08 to -0.01; I2=68%) and those including patients with depressive symptoms (SMD, -0.27; 95% CI, -0.53 to -0.01; I2=68%). The high level of heterogeneity (I2) observed was not due to differences in the type of depression or treatment. In subanalysis, the antidepressant effect of the NSAID celecoxib (a selective COX-2 inhibitor) stood out, with a trend toward superiority in general (SMD, -0.29; 95% CI, -0.49 to -0.08; I2=73%); when used as an add-on treatment, celecoxib improved remission (odds ratio [OR], 7.89; 95% CI, 2.94 to 21.17; I2=0%) and response (OR, 6.59; 95% CI, 2.24 to 19.42; I2=0%). Although not all trials reported on adverse effects, in the six that did, no evidence was found for increased gastrointestinal and cardiovascular events over that observed with placebo after 6 weeks of anti-inflammatory treatment, likewise for infections after a 12-week treatment. Of note, the risk of bias associated with all trials was high due to potentially compromised internal validity. Nonetheless, results suggest that anti-inflammatorytherapy, especially celecoxib, improves symptoms of depression without increasing the risk for adverse side effects; this proof of concept supports anti-inflammatory therapy use in depression.
The IDO-related pathway in major depression and schizophrenia
Immune system alterations affect neurotransmission propagated through dopaminergic, noradrenergic, serotonergic, and glutamatergic systems. The metabolism of tryptophan influences neurotransmission propagated through the serotonergic and glutamatergic systems by regulating the enzymatic activity (activation or inhibition) of IDO (mentioned briefly in the section above on NSAIDs in MD). In an activated immune system, some cytokines (eg, interferon-γ [IFN-γ] and TNF-α)activate IDO, a key enzyme in the metabolism of tryptophan, whereas other cytokines have an inhibitory effect. Tryptophan/kynurenine metabolism and its potential role in schizophrenia and major depression is depicted in and described here, Inhibiting IDO at the step where it catalyzes the degradation of serotonin (one of the metabolites of tryptophan) into formyl-5-hydroxykynuramine (f50HKYM) increases serotonin availability, and the neuroactive metabolites of the tryptophan/kynurenine metabolism path way—kynurenic acid (KYNA) and quinolinic acid (QUIN)—act as an iV-methyl-D-aspartate (NMD A) -receptor antagonist and an NMDA-receptor agonist, respectively, with very different end effects. In more detail, KYNA is the only known naturally occurring NMDA receptor antagonist in the human CNS. It is formed from kynurenine, the primary major degradation product of tryptophan, with that first rate-limiting step catalyzed by IDO and tryptophan 2,3-dioxygenase (TDO). Kynurenine has other metabolites, 3-hydroxykynurenine and QUIN, which are formed on the path leading to nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide formation; however, KYNA is derived from a separate dead-end path. KYNA has a dual role: it blocks the glycine coagonist binding site on the NMDA receptor and noncompetitively inhibits the alpha-7 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor ; it thus potentially offers neuroprotection. QUIN, however, is an NMDA-receptor agonist and exhibits neurotoxic effects. It is of interest then that in MD, higher levels of 3-hydroxykynurenine and QUIN have been reported, whereas in schizophrenia, increased levels of KYNA were observed in serum and cerebrospinal fluid. The function of these metabolites and the findings in schizophrenia and MD make them interesting candidates for therapeutic interventions in major psychiatric disorders. However, to date, only studies in animal models have been reported. We should consider whether a direct effect on inflammation could have a better therapeutic impact than the indirect effects of the kynurenine metabolites.
Inflammation and schizophrenia: cytokines, infection, and schizophrenia risk
It appears that the cytokines IL-1β and IL-β have a strong effect on how neurotransmitter systems important in schizophrenia develop; IL-16 can induce a dopaminergic phenotype in rat mesencephalic progenitor cells,- and IL-6 can decrease the survival of fetal brain serotonergic neurons. Moreover, it has been shown that the administration of IL-1μ after birth affects dopaminergic neurotransmission in adulthood. However, it is possible that IL-1 and IL-6, mainly released from monocytes of the “innate immune system,” only indicate the immune activation state, and their specificity is still unclear.
There is evidence that exposure to infections during the prenatal or perinatal period is a risk factor for schizophrenia, and this notion does not come solely from evidence derived from animal models., In humans, infections—from a number of viral disorders—have been investigated as risk factors for schizophrenia. - Respiratory infections, , genital infections, and reproductive tract infections , have been linked to increased risk for schizophrenia in offspring. In pregnant women, infection with Toxoplasma gondii has been closely studied as a potential risk factor for schizophrenia.
In humans, elevated maternal levels of IL-8, due to any reason, during pregnancy has been associated with an increased risk for schizophrenia in offspringand significantly related to decreased brain volume in schizophrenic offspring (more specifically, smaller right posterior cingulate and left entorhinal cortex volumes and larger ventricular volumes).
Infection and increased risk for schizophrenia
In psychiatry's first large-scale epidemiological study, severe infections and autoimmune disorders were recently shown to additively increase the risk for developing schizophrenia and schizophrenia spectrum disorders.This was notable as previous studies had mostly investigated the effect of maternal infections during pregnancy (in animal models), and only rarely have studies looked at the effect of infections occurring throughout the lifespan of schizophrenia patients. , As infections were only recorded if they led to hospital admission—which would capture only very severe infections—the sensitivity with regard to recording infections was not high. Thus, despite the scale of the study, it is possible that only a small portion of the risk factors were identified.
Cytokine alterations and neuroprogression in schizophrenia
In schizophrenia patients, high blood and cerebrospinal fluid levels of proinflammatory molecules, including cytokines, have been reported. Imbalances in immune systems—including the innate system (eg, monocytes, macrophages), proinflammatory and anti-inflammatory systems, and type 1 and 2 immunity—in schizophrenia point to an important role for inflammation in the pathophysiology of the disease, in at least a subgroup of patients. ,
A specific focus on neuroprogression must consider cytokine levels in different stages of the disease and of treatment. Data clearly reveal that both the stage of the disease and the choice of antipsychotic have an influence on immune function.,
A meta-analysis that included 40 studies investigating cytokines in schizophrenia at various disease stages and treatment conditions showed that proinflammatory cytokines were significantly elevated. This meta-analysis differentiated between drug-naive first-episode psychosis, an acute relapse of psychosis, and a third group of schizophrenia patients who were stable medicated outpatients with treatment-resistant psychosis. Patients with first-episode schizophrenia and those with acute relapse similarly had higher blood levels of IL-6, IFN-γ, and TNF-α than controls.However, the third group under antipsychotic treatment showed a significant decrease in IL-6, I1-1β, and IFN-γ, and an increase in IL12 and soluble IL-2 receptor. Whether this is an effect of antipsychotic treatment, chronicity, or both, cannot be determined. It is well-known, however, that antipsychotic treatment has an important impact on cytokine levels.
There are other interfering clinical variables that should be considered, including weight gain, body mass index, smoking, aging, age of onset, duration and severity of the disorder, psychopathological symptoms, and hospitalization. Additionally, laboratory variables should be considered, such as test sensitivity, sample storage, and the mode of release and action of cytokines (eg, IFN-γ acts via paracrine signaling through cell-cell contact, whereas TNF-α and IL-6 act through endocrine signaling).
These data show that antipsychotic treatment elicits a different cytokine release pattern that drives most of the cytokine levels in schizophrenic patients toward “normalization.” The data consistently show, despite the influence of several interfering variables, that proinflammatory cytokine levels are elevated in schizophrenia. Less clear, however, is the impact that neuroprogression or the schizophrenic state becoming chronic has on immune variables.
The effects of anti-inflammatory treatment in schizophrenia: therapeutic benefit in early stages
An important argument that inflammation is involved in schizophrenia is the benefit derived from treatment with anti-inflammatory drugs. In particular, adding celecoxib (COX-2 inhibitor) to risperidone treatment in patients with acute exacerbations of schizophrenia led to a better outcome than treatment with risperidone alone in a prospective, randomized, double-blind study,and COX-2 inhibition has pronounced effects on cognition in schizophrenia. Pooled data (n=90) in a further study of risperidone and celecoxib add-on revealed that patients with a disease duration of 2 years or less benefited from a 6-week celecoxib treatment, whereas the effects of such treatment in those who had the disease for a longer period of time did not differ from the risperidone and placebo group.
Thus, the efficacy of COX-2 inhibitor therapy appears to be most pronounced in the initial years of the disease, confirming the findings of Rapaport and colleagues, who did not find a benefit of COX-2 inhibition in chronic schizophrenia.Therefore, a celecoxib add-on study was designed for first-episode schizophrenia, which also showed a benefit from celecoxib add-on treatment (add-on to amisulpride) in schizophrenia, not only on the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total score, but also on the positive symptom, negative symptom, and general psychopathology scores. , Recently, acetylsalicylic acid, a mixed COX-l/COX-2 inhibitor, was shown to have a beneficial effect in schizophrenic spectrum disorders ; thus, it would appear that the therapeutic effect of anti-inflammatory treatment is not restricted to COX-2 inhibition. Whereas one meta-analysis of the clinical effects of NSAIDS in schizophrenia showed significant effects on total PANSS scores, as well as subscores for positive and negative symptoms of schizophrenia, another revealed that only those patients with first-episode schizophrenia or who had the disease for only a short period of time benefited from such treatment.
One could interpret these results to mean that longterm symptoms are associated with poorer anti-inflammatory treatment efficacy in schizophrenia and that efficacy of anti-inflammatory treatment is related to the stage of the disease. However, it is well-known from experience with first- or second-generation antipsychotics that the disease becoming chronic has a negative impact on the outcome in general. As the anti-inflammatory treatment studies discussed here are short-term studies lasting several weeks, it is also taken into account that short-term anti-inflammatory treatment has weak effects in chronic inflammatory diseases. Longer antiinflammatory treatment might show different effects in chronic schizophrenia.
Other immune-related substances in treatment of schizophrenia
Microglia activation has an important role in inflammation; thus, the antibiotic minocycline—which inhibits microglia activation—is of interest in the treatment of schizophrenia. Indeed, minocycline has been reported to improve cognition in animal models of the diseasebut also in human schizophrenia patients, evidenced by two double -blind, placebo-controlled trials investigating minocycline as an add-on therapy. , It has also demonstrated positive effects on the negative symptoms of schizophrenia in clinical studies. Furthermore, beneficial effects of minocycline treatment on the entire range of schizophrenia symptoms have been described in case reports.
Schizophrenic patients have been shown to receive some benefit from treatment with acetylcysteine and other molecules, such as omega-3 fatty acids, with antiinflammatory effects, among others (see reference 74 for an overview).
Although results are preliminary, initial pilot trials treating schizophrenia using IFN-γ to stimulate the monocytic type 1 immune response have been encouraging; however, patients must be closely monitored for adverse side effects, including unwanted effects on the immune system. Nevertheless, an immune-based approach opens the door to new possibilities for therapeutic development based on the etiopathology of schizophrenia.
The use of mAbs is an emerging topic for schizophrenia therapy. However, there is no convincing data that they are currently useful in schizophrenia. Nonetheless, there is rationale based on cytokine data for the development of compelling, carefully planned clinical trials with mABs.Indeed, studies using mABs against IL-6 and soluble IL-6 receptor are on the way.
Emerging evidence points to a role of the inflammatory process in the pathogenesis of major psychiatric disorders. Accordingly, during the last decade, anti-inflammatory therapeutic approaches have been studied in schizophrenia and depression. COX-2 inhibitors show beneficial effects in the early stages of schizophrenia, and promising results have been obtained for MD. Moreover, interesting results come from studies with other antiinflammatory compounds, including antibodies against IL-6 and TNF-oc. Intensive research, however, is necessary in order to clarify whether an immune-related therapy may one day replace treatment with the currently available antidepressants or antipsychotics, at least in subgroups of patients with MD or schizophrenia.